Questions a serious buyer should ask.

Software that structures a consequential business decision, maps plausible stakeholder responses, exposes assumptions, and turns uncertainty into a conditional recommendation and validation plan before commitment.

No. It helps decide what to research next. Illustrative responses are hypotheses and should be calibrated with interviews, experiments, operating data, and observed outcomes.

Include the current state, proposed change, target customer, market, objective, timing, constraints, success metric, and the evidence already available.

A useful report distinguishes user-supplied facts, observed evidence, model assumptions, weak assumptions, and missing information. The recommendation should narrow when evidence quality is weak.

Confidence describes how well the available inputs and evidence support the direction of the recommendation. It is not the probability that the future will happen exactly as shown.

The workflow supports pricing and packaging, product launches, ICP changes, market entry, positioning, and growth-priority decisions. Specific context produces a more useful result.

Public rehearsals require no account. When signed in, you can save and manage only your own private decision history; authorized site operators may access service data when needed to operate and secure the product.

Run the cheapest test that could change the recommendation, record the observed result, update the weak assumptions, and compare the next decision against better evidence.